Use of a Firearm in Crime of Violence lawyer New Jersey, NJ
Federal charges involving the use of a firearm in a crime of violence carry severe consequences under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). If you are facing such an accusation in New Jersey, you need a defense team that understands the federal court system and the unique challenges these counts present. Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. represents clients in New Jersey federal court, with Mr. Sris, a former prosecutor, experienced the defense. Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys are admitted across multiple states and have handled federal matters in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey. To request a consultation and discuss your situation, reach the firm at (888) 437-7747. Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. – Advocacy Without Borders.
What It Means to Be Charged with Using a Firearm in a Crime of Violence in New Jersey
Federal law under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) makes it a separate offense to use, carry, brandish, or discharge a firearm during and in relation to a federal crime of violence or drug trafficking crime. When the government proceeds under this statute, it charges the firearm count alongside the underlying offense, and a conviction on the § 924(c) count results in a mandatory prison term that must run consecutively to any sentence imposed for the underlying crime.
In New Jersey, these cases are prosecuted by the United States Attorney’s Office for the District of New Jersey, with investigations often led by the FBI, ATF, DEA, or other federal agencies. The U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey—with courthouses in Newark, Trenton, and Camden—hears these matters. Because federal firearm convictions carry mandatory minimums and there is no parole in the federal system, the stakes are extremely high. Early involvement of a federal criminal defense attorney who practices regularly in the District of New Jersey is critical to protecting your rights.
The Federal Court Process for Firearm Charges in New Jersey
Federal firearm cases follow a procedural path distinct from state court. After a federal investigation, charges are typically brought by a grand jury indictment. The defendant then appears before a federal magistrate judge in the district for an initial appearance and, shortly after, a detention hearing where the court decides whether to release the person pending trial or to order detention. Federal prosecutors in the District of New Jersey often argue that firearm-involved defendants present a danger to the community, making pretrial detention a realistic possibility.
Following detention and arraignment, the discovery phase begins. The government must disclose evidence, including the firearm itself, forensic reports, witness statements, and any audio or video recordings. The defense has an opportunity to file pretrial motions—for example, to suppress evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment or to challenge the admissibility of certain testimony. If the case does not resolve through a negotiated plea, it proceeds to trial before a U.S. District Judge. At sentencing, the federal sentencing guidelines are strongly influential, but the mandatory minimum sentence under § 924(c) often dictates the floor. Throughout every stage, having counsel who knows the local federal court landscape can meaningfully affect the direction of the case.
How Mr. Sris and the Firm’s Of Counsel Attorneys Handle Firearm in Crime of Violence Cases
Defending against a § 924(c) charge requires examining both the firearm allegation and the predicate offense. One key area of challenge is whether the underlying crime qualifies as a “crime of violence” under the statute. The Supreme Court has limited the scope of what constitutes a crime of violence for purposes of § 924(c), and a viable legal argument that the predicate offense does not meet the statutory definition can lead to dismissal of the firearm count.
Additionally, the government must prove that the defendant knowingly possessed, brandished, or discharged the firearm in furtherance of the predicate crime. Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys scrutinize the nexus between the firearm and the alleged offense, examining whether forensic evidence, witness accounts, or law enforcement procedures are sufficient to meet the government’s burden. Where evidence was gathered through an unconstitutional search or seizure, a motion to suppress can weaken or eliminate the government’s case. The goal in every matter is to build a thorough defense strategy that addresses the specific facts, while being prepared to negotiate for a resolution that avoids the mandatory consecutive sentence where possible.
About Mr. Sris and the Firm’s Of Counsel Attorneys
Mr. Sris, Owner and Founder of Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C., is a former prosecutor. He founded the firm in 1997 and is admitted in Virginia, Maryland, the District of Columbia, New Jersey, and New York. Mr. Sris testified before the Virginia House Courts of Justice Committee in support of 2019 HB 635 (chief patron Del. David Bulova). Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys bring extensive combined legal experience. Results may vary. The firm’s attorneys appear in federal court in New Jersey and can guide you through the federal criminal justice process from investigation through resolution.
Frequently Asked Questions
Do I need a lawyer for a federal firearm charge in New Jersey?
Yes, you need an experienced federal criminal defense attorney immediately if you are facing a firearm charge in the District of New Jersey. Federal firearm cases carry mandatory minimums and are prosecuted actively. State-court experience does not translate directly to federal court; the rules of procedure, sentencing guidelines, and pretrial detention standards are different. Early legal guidance can affect whether you are detained, how charges evolve, and what options are available before an indictment.
How does a New Jersey lawyer defend against use of a firearm in crime of violence charges?
Defense strategies in New Jersey federal court focus on challenging the predicate crime’s classification, contesting the firearm nexus, and examining the legality of the investigation. A lawyer may argue that the underlying offense does not meet the statutory definition of a crime of violence under binding federal precedent, that the government cannot prove the firearm was brandished or discharged, or that key evidence was obtained in violation of the Constitution. Each defense is tailored to the specific facts of the case.
What are the penalties for using a firearm in a crime of violence in New Jersey?
Under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c), a conviction carries a mandatory minimum prison term that must be served consecutively to any sentence for the underlying offense. The length of the mandatory minimum depends on the conduct—brandishing, discharging, or simply carrying the firearm during the crime. There is no parole in the federal system, meaning the full term must be served, less limited good-time credit. The federal sentencing guidelines also influence the overall sentence, but cannot go below the statutory minimum.
What should I do if I am facing use of a firearm in crime of violence charges in New Jersey?
If you are under investigation or have been charged, contact a federal criminal attorney immediately and do not discuss the case with anyone other than your lawyer. Preserve any relevant documents, messages, or other evidence that might support your defense. Remain silent if approached by law enforcement and request that your attorney be present during any questioning. Acting early can help protect your rights and may influence whether charges are filed.
Can a federal firearms charge be dropped in New Jersey?
A federal firearms charge may be dismissed or reduced if the government’s evidence is insufficient, if the predicate offense is not a qualifying crime of violence, or if constitutional violations undermine the prosecution. Dismissals are not common, but a skilled defense team can negotiate for the charge to be dismissed as part of a plea agreement involving other counts, or can persuade the court to dismiss after a successful pretrial motion. Every case is unique.
How long does a federal criminal case take in New Jersey?
A federal case in the District of New Jersey can take several months to more than a year, depending on complexity, the pretrial motions schedule, and whether the matter goes to trial. The Speedy Trial Act requires trial within 70 days of indictment, but many delays are excludable by agreement or court order. Complex cases involving multiple defendants or extensive forensic evidence often take longer. Your attorney can provide a more precise estimate after reviewing the specifics.
What is the difference between state and federal firearm charges?
Federal firearm charges, such as those under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c), involve federal crimes of violence or drug trafficking and carry mandatory consecutive sentences with no parole. State charges are prosecuted in local courts under New Jersey law and may allow for parole or early release. Federal cases are handled by the U.S. Attorney’s Office rather than the county prosecutor, and the federal sentencing guidelines apply. The procedural and sentencing differences are significant.
Where are federal firearm cases heard in New Jersey?
Federal firearm cases are heard in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, which has courthouses in Newark, Trenton, and Camden. The assigned location depends on where the alleged offense occurred and the division of the U.S. Attorney’s Office handling the case. Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys are familiar with each of these venues.
Can I get bail in a federal firearm case in New Jersey?
Bail in federal court is governed by the Bail Reform Act, and firearm-involved defendants often face a presumption of detention. At the detention hearing, the magistrate judge considers whether the defendant poses a flight risk or a danger to the community. Because § 924(c) charges trigger a rebuttable presumption that no conditions can assure safety, securing pretrial release is difficult but not impossible. An attorney can present evidence and arguments for release.
Why choose Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. for a federal firearm case in New Jersey?
Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. brings decades of combined federal criminal defense experience, with Mr. Sris’s background as a former prosecutor providing insight into how the government builds its case. The firm is admitted in five jurisdictions, including New Jersey, and regularly handles federal firearm matters in the District of New Jersey. Clients work with a team that understands local federal practice and is prepared to challenge the government’s evidence at every stage. For a consultation, reach Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys at (888) 437-7747.
If you are seeking a federal criminal defense lawyer in a neighboring New Jersey county, visit our related pages:
Federal Criminal Lawyer Hunterdon County | Federal Criminal Lawyer Somerset County | Federal Criminal Lawyer Morris County | Federal Criminal Lawyer Bergen County | Federal Criminal Lawyer Monmouth County
Primary sources: U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey | 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)
Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Attorney responsible for this advertising: Mr. Sris.
Results may vary.
Case results depend on a variety of factors unique to each case.