Use of a Firearm in Crime of Violence lawyer DC
You were arrested in Washington, D.C., after an incident allegedly involving a firearm and a federal crime of violence. Now federal prosecutors are building a case under statutes that carry mandatory minimum prison time and consecutive sentencing. At Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C., Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys understand how the U.S. Attorney’s Office pursues firearm‑related federal charges. We challenge the government’s evidence, scrutinize the alleged “crime of violence” predicate, and work toward the most favorable resolution possible. Reach our firm at (888) 437‑7747 to request a consultation. Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. – Advocacy Without Borders.
Defense Strategies for Federal Firearm Charges
Federal prosecutors must prove every element beyond a reasonable doubt. Defense strategy begins by examining whether the underlying offense qualifies as a “crime of violence” under current case law — a definition that has narrowed after recent Supreme Court decisions. An experienced defense attorney will test whether the government can establish a nexus between the firearm and the alleged crime, challenge identification and witness reliability, and expose flaws in the investigation. Pre‑trial motions may seek suppression of evidence gathered in violation of the Fourth Amendment or statements taken without proper Miranda warnings. Where appropriate, counsel may negotiate with the U.S. Attorney’s Office to seek dismissal of the firearm count in exchange for a plea on a lesser charge, or pursue a safety‑valve or substantial‑assistance departure to mitigate sentencing exposure.
Because a conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) carries mandatory time served consecutively to any other sentence, the stakes demand a thorough, detail‑oriented defense. Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys evaluate every angle — from grand jury procedure to forensic ballistics — to build a strategy tailored to the specific facts of your case.
The Federal Court Process in Washington, D.C.
Federal firearm prosecutions in the District of Columbia follow a distinct path. The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia handles most local violent crime as federal offenses, with cases brought in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia at the E. Barrett Prettyman U.S. Courthouse. After an arrest, a defendant appears before a magistrate judge for an initial appearance and probable‑cause determination. The court will rule on pretrial detention — often a critical stage, as federal firearm charges carry a presumption of detention. A grand jury then hears evidence and returns an indictment.
Following indictment, the court holds an arraignment, and the discovery process begins. Federal discovery is governed by the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and the government must disclose its evidence, including witness statements and forensic reports. Pretrial motions may challenge the sufficiency of the indictment, move to suppress evidence, or seek discovery sanctions. If the case does not resolve by plea negotiation, it proceeds to jury trial before a district judge. At sentencing, the court applies the United States Sentencing Guidelines, though the mandatory‑minimum provisions of Section 924(c) override guideline ranges and impose a sentence that must run consecutively to any other prison time. There is no parole in the federal system, only a potential reduction for good‑time credits and supervised release after incarceration. Throughout the process, careful preparation and familiarity with the local practices of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia are essential.
Potential Penalties for Using a Firearm in a Crime of Violence
Federal law treats the use or carrying of a firearm during a crime of violence with dedicated severity. Under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c), a conviction triggers a mandatory minimum prison sentence that must be served consecutively to any sentence for the underlying offense. The actual term depends on how the firearm was employed — whether it was merely possessed, brandished, or discharged — and whether the defendant has a prior Section 924(c) conviction. A first offense involving mere possession carries a five‑year mandatory minimum; brandishing increases the floor to seven years; and discharging the firearm elevates it to ten years. A second or subsequent Section 924(c) conviction imposes a mandatory minimum of twenty‑five years, consecutive to all other sentences. These statutes remove sentencing discretion from the judge, making early strategic intervention critical. In addition to imprisonment, the court may impose fines, restitution, and a term of supervised release. The absence of parole means that every day of a mandatory‑minimum sentence must be served in federal custody.
Because these penalties stack atop any sentence for the underlying crime of violence — which may itself be substantial — a person facing a Section 924(c) charge can be looking at decades of incarceration. Only a thorough defense that challenges the firearm‑predicate connection and examines constitutional violations can create leverage in plea negotiations or at trial. Results in any individual case depend on the specific facts and procedural posture; no attorney can guarantee a particular outcome.
Legal Representation by Mr. Sris and the Firm’s Of Counsel Attorneys
Mr. Sris, Owner and Founder of Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C., founded the firm in 1997. He is a former prosecutor who has concentrated his practice on criminal defense for more than twenty‑five years. Mr. Sris is admitted to practice in Virginia, Maryland, the District of Columbia, New Jersey, and New York, and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys include litigators admitted in the District of Columbia and Virginia with extensive federal court experience. Collectively, they have handled matters involving complex federal statutes, including firearm and violent‑crime charges, and are familiar with the procedures and personnel of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.
Mr. Sris testified before the Virginia House Courts of Justice Committee in support of 2019 HB 635 (chief patron Del. David Bulova). His background as a former prosecutor gives him insight into how the government builds its cases, and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys contribute additional trial‑tested perspective. When you engage Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C., you work with attorneys who understand federal criminal procedure and who are prepared to challenge the government’s evidence at every phase — from investigation through trial and, if necessary, appeal. All consultations are by appointment; call (888) 437‑7747 to request a consultation.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is considered a “crime of violence” under federal firearm law?
Federal statute 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3) defines “crime of violence” as a felony offense that has as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against another person, or that by its nature involves a substantial risk that force may be used. After the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Davis, the residual clause is void, so the “elements clause” is the only operative definition. Many federal charges — such as robbery, carjacking, and certain assault offenses — may qualify. Whether a particular underlying charge meets the definition is a frequent subject of pre‑trial litigation and can be a powerful defense argument.
What are the penalties for using a firearm during a federal crime of violence?
A conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) carries a mandatory minimum prison sentence served consecutively to any other sentence; a first offense involving mere possession has a five‑year floor, brandishing raises it to seven years, and discharging the firearm elevates it to ten years. A second or subsequent conviction imposes a mandatory minimum of twenty‑five years. There is no parole in the federal system. Fines, restitution, and supervised release may also be imposed. The exact penalty depends on the specific factual allegations and the defendant’s prior record.
How can a defense attorney challenge a federal firearm charge?
Defense attorneys challenge federal firearm charges by scrutinizing whether the government can prove a connection between the firearm and the alleged crime of violence, attacking the legal sufficiency of the underlying predicate offense, and moving to suppress evidence obtained through unconstitutional searches or interrogations. They may also examine the reliability of witness identifications, the chain of custody of forensic evidence, and whether the prosecution has met its burden on every element. Early involvement often provides more opportunities to negotiate a reduction or dismissal.
Do I need a lawyer if I’m under investigation for a federal firearm offense?
Yes, you need legal representation as soon as you become aware of a federal investigation. Statements you make to law enforcement can be used against you, and the decisions you make early in an investigation — such as whether to consent to a search or speak with investigators — can have long‑term consequences. An attorney experienced in federal criminal defense can advise you on your rights and intervene before charges are filed, sometimes persuading the U.S. Attorney’s Office not to pursue an indictment.
What should I do if I am arrested on federal firearm charges in D.C.?
Exercise your right to remain silent and immediately request to speak with an attorney. Do not discuss the facts of your case with anyone except your lawyer, including during phone calls from the detention facility that may be monitored. An experienced federal criminal lawyer can guide you through the initial appearance, detention hearing, and subsequent proceedings. Contact Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. at (888) 437‑7747 as soon as possible to discuss your situation.
Can a federal firearm charge under Section 924(c) be dismissed?
Yes, federal firearm charges can be dismissed if the prosecution’s evidence is insufficient, if constitutional violations taint the government’s case, or if the court determines that the underlying offense does not qualify as a crime of violence. Dismissal may also occur as part of a negotiated resolution where the U.S. Attorney agrees to drop the firearm count. Each case is fact‑specific, and success depends on the evidence and the quality of the defense mounted.
For a full statutory breakdown, see our comprehensive analysis at srislawyer.com.
Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. serves Washington, D.C., from its Arlington, VA location: 1655 Fort Myer Dr, Suite 700, Room 719, Arlington, VA 22209. By appointment only. Call (888) 437‑7747 to request a consultation.
Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Results may vary.
Case results depend on a variety of factors unique to each case.