Theft of Government Property lawyer Maryland, MD

Federal prosecution for theft of government property in Maryland is handled by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Maryland, which files charges in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland. Because these cases involve property owned by the United States—including funds, equipment, records, or services—they carry the full resources of federal investigative agencies such as the FBI, IRS‑CI, and DHS‑OIG. Unlike state theft charges, a federal theft-of-government-property case invokes the Federal Sentencing Guidelines and is adjudicated in a system that eliminated parole more than three decades ago. Allegations may arise from a federal audit, a whistleblower complaint, or a parallel civil investigation, and the government often builds its case through documentary records rather than eyewitness testimony. Anyone who learns they are the subject of a federal inquiry needs experienced counsel who regularly appears in the District of Maryland, where the Baltimore and Greenbelt divisions hear criminal matters. Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys concentrate their practice on federal criminal defense and represent clients facing theft-of-government-property allegations. Reach Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. at (888) 437-7747 to request a consultation. Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. – Advocacy Without Borders.

On this page

What Theft of Government Property Means in Maryland

Federal theft of government property is prosecuted under 18 U.S.C. § 641 and related statutes. The charge covers the unauthorized conversion of any record, voucher, money, or thing of value belonging to the United States, or the knowing receipt, concealment, or retention of the same with intent to convert it. Because the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland has jurisdiction over all federal criminal matters in the state, the case proceeds in either the Baltimore division or the Greenbelt division, depending on where the alleged conduct occurred. The U.S. Attorney’s Office for Maryland asserts federal jurisdiction broadly, so conduct that might otherwise appear to be a state theft matter—such as misuse of a federal grant, theft from a federally funded program, or embezzlement of federal benefits—can become a federal case. The standard of proof, discovery obligations, and evidentiary rules under the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure differ materially from state-court practice, making familiarity with federal procedure essential from the earliest stage.

Federal theft-of-government-property cases frequently involve extensive documentary evidence and agency audits. Investigators from the FBI, the IRS Criminal Investigation division, or an agency-specific Office of Inspector General may have spent months compiling records before an arrest or indictment. The government’s access to electronic records, bank statements, and agency databases means the factual record is often voluminous. A defendant’s prior dealings with the government—such as contract payments, grant reimbursements, or benefit receipts—are scrutinized in detail. Because the Federal Sentencing Guidelines take into account the amount of loss and the nature of the property, the precise value attributed to the alleged theft has significant consequences at sentencing. Clients meeting with counsel at the firm’s Rockville location can expect a thorough assessment of the government’s claimed loss figures and the legal theory underlying the charge.

How Mr. Sris and the Firm’s Of Counsel Attorneys Handle Federal Theft of Government Property Cases

Early involvement by defense counsel is critical because federal investigations often proceed for months before charges are filed. Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys focus on engaging with the government at the first indication of inquiry—whether a grand-jury subpoena, a target letter, or a visit from federal agents—to help protect the client’s rights during the investigation phase. The team evaluates the strength of the government’s documentary evidence, examines whether any statements made to investigators were taken in compliance with procedural requirements, and explores whether the alleged conduct falls within the scope of the charged statute. Because the government’s loss calculation drives the sentencing exposure, a detailed review of the financial records is central to the defense strategy in every theft-of-government-property case.

Once charges are brought, the matter proceeds through arraignment, pretrial motions, discovery, and, in many instances, plea negotiations or trial. The firm’s Of Counsel attorneys, who include former prosecutors, understand the government’s internal charging and plea-bargaining dynamics and use that insight to help clients evaluate options. If a case proceeds to trial, the defense may challenge the sufficiency of the government’s evidence of intent to convert, contest the ownership or value of the property, or argue that the defendant lacked the requisite mens rea. Throughout the process, the team works to keep clients informed of developments and to present the factual and legal arguments that best support their defense.

About Mr. Sris and the Firm’s Of Counsel Attorneys

Mr. Sris, Owner and Founder of Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C., is a former prosecutor who has practiced criminal law since 1997. He is admitted to the bar in Virginia, Maryland, the District of Columbia, New Jersey, and New York, and he concentrates his practice on federal criminal defense matters, including theft of government property. Mr. Sris testified before the Virginia House Courts of Justice Committee in support of 2019 HB 635 (chief patron Del. David Bulova). The firm’s Of Counsel attorneys bring extensive combined legal experience, including backgrounds in state and federal prosecution and criminal defense. They support Mr. Sris in preparing cases for federal court in Maryland and nationwide.

All attorneys representing clients through the firm are licensed in the jurisdictions where they appear. Because federal practice is distinct from state practice, the team devotes substantial attention to the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, and the local rules of the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland. Clients can meet with counsel at the firm’s Rockville location by appointment. The firm serves individuals throughout Maryland, including Montgomery County, Prince George’s County, Howard County, Anne Arundel County, Frederick County, and all other Maryland counties.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is theft of government property under federal law?

Federal theft of government property is the knowing conversion of money, equipment, records, or any item of value belonging to the United States, prosecuted under 18 U.S.C. § 641 in U.S. District Court. The statute also covers the receipt, concealment, or retention of such property. The government must prove that the defendant acted with intent to convert the property to their own use or the use of another. Even a small amount can trigger a federal case, though the loss amount influences the sentencing range under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines. The charge is not limited to physical theft; it can encompass theft of government services, overbilling on federal contracts, or misusing federal grant funds.

How does the U.S. Attorney’s Office handle theft of government property in Maryland?

The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Maryland prosecutes theft-of-government-property cases in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland, with trial locations in Baltimore and Greenbelt. These cases typically begin with a grand‑jury investigation, often following a referral from a federal agency’s Office of Inspector General. The USAO works with investigative agents to build the factual case, and targets may receive a target letter or be subpoenaed to testify. Indictments in these matters allege the specific property and its value, as well as the defendant’s intent. Because the government uses its own records to establish ownership and loss, defense counsel’s early review of those records is essential.

Do I need a lawyer if I am under investigation for theft of government property in Maryland?

Anyone who learns they are the subject of a federal theft-of-government-property investigation should retain an experienced federal criminal defense lawyer as early as possible. Early counsel can help prevent self‑incrimination during interviews, preserve the ability to negotiate before charges are filed, and challenge the scope of subpoenas or search warrants. Once an indictment is returned, the consequences of a conviction—imprisonment, significant fines, restitution, and the collateral damage of a felony record—are substantial. Because the federal system does not afford parole, the sentence imposed is the actual time to be served, making the stakes uniquely high.

What distinguishes federal theft of government property from a state theft charge?

The primary distinction is jurisdiction: federal theft of government property involves property belonging to the United States government, while state theft charges concern property owned by private individuals or state entities. In federal court, the rules of procedure and evidence differ from state court, and sentencing is governed by the Federal Sentencing Guidelines rather than state statutory ranges. Federal cases are investigated by federal agencies and prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney’s Office, whereas state theft cases are handled by local prosecutors. Moreover, a conviction in federal court carries the stigma and disabilities of a federal felony, including potential restrictions on certain employment, professional licenses, and firearm possession.

What should I do if federal agents contact me about theft of government property?

If federal agents contact you regarding theft of government property, you should decline to answer questions without counsel present and immediately contact a federal criminal defense attorney. Federal agents may approach you in person, by phone, or at your workplace. You are under no obligation to speak with them, and anything you say can be used against you in a subsequent prosecution. Ask for a lawyer and do not provide any information, even if you believe you have done nothing wrong. Do not consent to a search of your property or electronic devices without a warrant. Prompt legal representation can help protect your rights from the very first contact.

How can a lawyer help defend against federal theft of government property charges?

A defense attorney can challenge the government’s evidence of intent, contest the valuation of the property, and explore whether a civil resolution or deferred prosecution is possible. After a thorough review of the records underlying the charge, counsel may identify weaknesses in the government’s case—for example, a lack of proof that the property belonged to the United States, or evidence that the defendant lacked the requisite intent to commit theft. Defense counsel can also advocate for pretrial release, negotiate with the prosecutor regarding the loss amount, and present mitigating information to the court. By preparing a defense that addresses both the legal elements of the offense and the sentencing guidelines, an experienced federal criminal lawyer works toward the favorable outcomes for the client.

Authority references: 18 U.S.C. § 641 – Theft of Government Property · U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland · U.S. Attorney’s Office, District of Maryland

Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Case results depend on a variety of factors unique to each case.