Aggravated Identity Theft lawyer DC

Under 18 U.S.C. § 1028A, aggravated identity theft is a federal felony that adds a mandatory consecutive two‑year prison term to the sentence for an underlying felony — in Washington, D.C., this office prosecutes actively, and a conviction can mean years in a federal prison with no parole. If you or someone close to you has been contacted by federal agents, has received a target letter, or has been indicted in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, the time to act is immediate. Mr. Sris, a former prosecutor and the Owner and Founder of Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C., and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys defend individuals facing aggravated identity theft charges throughout the District. To request a consultation, call (888) 437-7747. Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. – Advocacy Without Borders.

On this page

What Aggravated Identity Theft Means in Washington, D.C.

Charges under 18 U.S.C. § 1028A arise when the government alleges that a defendant knowingly transferred, possessed, or used another person’s means of identification during and in relation to a predicate federal felony. The statute does not stand alone; it attaches to an underlying offense such as bank fraud, wire fraud, mail fraud, or immigration violations. In the District of Columbia, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia regularly pairs § 1028A with fraud, theft of government property, and false‑statement charges because the city’s dense federal workforce and contractor community make identity‑based offenses a top enforcement priority.

The federal court here — the E. Barrett Prettyman U.S. Courthouse on Constitution Avenue — applies the United States Sentencing Guidelines in every case. Judges in this district are experienced with complex white‑collar and fraud prosecutions, and the bench does not hesitate to impose substantial custodial sentences when the evidence supports a conviction. The firm’s Arlington location, just 4.5 miles from the courthouse, allows Mr. Sris and his Of Counsel to appear regularly in this court. Because most local crimes in D.C. Are also prosecuted federally by the U.S. Attorney’s Office, the line between “D.C. Local” and “federal” can blur — but aggravated identity theft is always a strictly federal charge heard in U.S. District Court. Clients from Georgetown, Capitol Hill, Dupont Circle, Adams Morgan, Navy Yard, and every other neighborhood across the city can reach the firm at (888) 437-7747.

How Mr. Sris and His Of Counsel Handle Aggravated Identity Theft Cases

Federal criminal defense requires an early, strategic response, and aggravated identity theft cases are no exception. The firm’s approach begins with an immediate analysis of the charging documents — whether it is a complaint, an indictment, or a target letter — to identify the precise predicate felony and the evidence the government intends to use. Because the mandatory two‑year sentence under § 1028A runs consecutively to any other sentence, every effort is directed toward either defeating the predicate charge, negotiating a resolution that does not include the § 1028A count, or presenting sentencing arguments that limit the overall term of imprisonment.

Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys examine the government’s proof on several fronts: the validity of the alleged “means of identification,” the knowledge element, the connection between the identification and the predicate felony, and any constitutional or evidentiary challenges. Pretrial motions may address suppression issues, discovery demands, or challenges to the sufficiency of the indictment. In plea negotiations, the safety‑valve and substantial‑assistance mechanisms under the sentencing guidelines can be critical, and the firm works to position clients for every available departure or reduction. Throughout the process, Mr. Sris draws on his background as a former prosecutor to anticipate the government’s strategy and to build a defense that accounts for the particular practices of the U.S. Attorney’s Office in this district.

About Mr. Sris and His Of Counsel

Mr. Sris, Owner and Founder of Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C., is a former prosecutor who has concentrated his practice on federal criminal defense for more than a quarter century. He is admitted in Virginia, Maryland, the District of Columbia, New Jersey, and New York, and he regularly appears before the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. His testimony before the Virginia House Courts of Justice Committee in support of 2019 HB 635 (chief patron Del. David Bulova) reflects a deep familiarity with statutory construction and legislative process.

The firm’s Of Counsel attorneys complement Mr. Sris’s experience with their own substantial backgrounds in federal criminal litigation, evidence analysis, and courtroom advocacy. Together, they provide a coordinated defense team that addresses every phase of a federal aggravated identity theft prosecution — from initial appearance and detention hearings through trial or sentencing. To discuss your case, call (888) 437-7747.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the penalty for aggravated identity theft in D.C.?

A conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 1028A carries a mandatory consecutive two‑year prison term. This sentence must be served after — not at the same time as — the sentence for the underlying felony. The total exposure therefore depends on the predicate offense: for example, if the underlying offense carries a five‑year maximum, a defendant could face a total of seven years. Federal judges have no authority to suspend the consecutive two‑year term or to order it served concurrently. Additionally, the court may impose fines, restitution, and a term of supervised release. A federal charge should be discussed with counsel immediately; call (888) 437-7747.

How does an attorney defend against aggravated identity theft charges?

Defense counsel may challenge the government’s ability to prove every element of the offense. Aggravated identity theft requires knowing possession, transfer, or use of another person’s means of identification during and in relation to a qualifying felony. A viable defense may arise if the government cannot establish knowledge, if the identification at issue does not qualify as a “means of identification,” or if the alleged act was not “in relation to” the predicate felony. Motions to suppress evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment or to dismiss an indictment that fails to charge an offense are also available tools. An experienced federal practitioner evaluates the specific facts to build the strong $1.

What should I do if I am facing aggravated identity theft charges in D.C.?

Contact a federal criminal defense attorney immediately and do not discuss the case with anyone else. Statements made to law enforcement or to third parties can be used against you. Preserve any documents or electronic records relevant to the matter, but do not alter or destroy anything. The statute of limitations and procedural deadlines in federal court move quickly, and a prompt response is essential. Mr. Sris and his Of Counsel can be reached at (888) 437-7747.

What is the difference between state and federal identity theft charges?

Federal identity theft charges are prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney’s Office in U.S. District Court and carry sentences without parole. While the District of Columbia also has its own criminal code enforced in D.C. Superior Court, aggravated identity theft under § 1028A is exclusively a federal offense. Federal investigations are typically conducted by agencies such as the FBI, Secret Service, or Postal Inspection Service, and federal sentencing guidelines apply. Because federal prosecutors have a high rate of conviction compared to many state‑level offices, mounting a serious defense from the outset is crucial.

Can aggravated identity theft charges be dropped or dismissed?

Charges can be dismissed if the government’s evidence is insufficient or if a pretrial motion succeeds. Prosecutors may also agree to drop the § 1028A count in exchange for a plea to the underlying felony when the interests of justice warrant it. Whether a dismissal is possible depends on the specific facts, the strength of the government’s case, and any legal or constitutional defects in the charges. Every avenue of attack — from factual insufficiency to procedural error — should be explored by counsel.

Do I need a lawyer for federal aggravated identity theft charges?

Yes — federal aggravated identity theft is a serious offense with a mandatory consecutive sentence, and navigating the federal criminal justice system without experienced counsel is extremely dangerous. The rules of procedure, the sentencing guidelines, and the government’s resources are unlike those in state court. A capable attorney can identify defenses, negotiate with prosecutors, and, where appropriate, present a compelling case for a sentence below the guidelines. To request a consultation, call (888) 437-7747.

Primary legal sources:
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia |
18 U.S.C. § 1028A |
U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia

Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Results may vary.

Case results depend on a variety of factors unique to each case.