Wire Fraud lawyer Maryland, MD
You open a letter from the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Maryland. It’s a target letter. The government is investigating whether you used emails, wire transfers, or phone calls to carry out an alleged scheme to defraud. Federal agents have been tracing your communications; they are building a case under 18 U.S.C. § 1343, the federal wire fraud statute. Wire fraud charges carry serious federal consequences, but an investigation does not have to become a conviction. Mr. Sris, Owner and Founder of Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C., together with the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys, defends individuals facing federal wire fraud allegations in Maryland. From the moment you learn you are a target, the steps you take matter. To discuss your situation, call (888) 437-7747. Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. – Advocacy Without Borders.
On this page
ToggleWhat Wire Fraud Means Under Federal Law
Wire fraud is a federal felony defined in 18 U.S.C. § 1343. The statute makes it a crime to knowingly devise or participate in a scheme to defraud another person of money or property, and to use interstate electronic communications—such as telephone calls, emails, text messages, faxes, or electronic fund transfers—to execute that scheme. Federal prosecutors must prove that you acted with intent to defraud, that the scheme involved materially false or fraudulent representations, and that you used an electronic communication across state lines to further the scheme. Unlike state theft or fraud charges, federal wire fraud charges are prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney’s Office, often after an investigation by the FBI, the Secret Service, or other federal agencies. Because wire fraud can be charged for each separate communication, a single alleged scheme can result in multiple counts, multiplying the potential exposure.
How Federal Wire Fraud Cases Proceed in Maryland
Federal wire fraud investigations in Maryland typically begin with a grand jury subpoena, a search warrant, or a target letter from the U.S. Attorney’s Office. Federal agents from the FBI or other agencies may interview witnesses, obtain financial records, and trace electronic communications. If the grand jury returns an indictment, the case proceeds in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland, which has divisions in Baltimore and Greenbelt. After an initial appearance and arraignment, pretrial motions and discovery shape the case. Wire fraud prosecutions involve extensive documentary evidence—emails, bank statements, wire transfer records—and often electronic discovery. The case may resolve through negotiations with the government or proceed to trial. Throughout, the federal sentencing guidelines influence every strategic decision. An experienced defense attorney who understands federal practice in the District of Maryland can evaluate the government’s evidence, identify weaknesses in the investigation, and pursue the most favorable resolution available under the specific facts.
Defense Strategies for Federal Wire Fraud Charges
Every wire fraud case is fact-specific, and several defense strategies may apply. One common approach challenges the intent element: showing that the defendant did not act with the specific intent to defraud, or that the representations made were not knowingly false. Another challenges the sufficiency of the government’s evidence that the defendant used interstate electronic communications to further the scheme. In some cases, the defense may demonstrate that the alleged victim did not rely on any misrepresentation, or that no actual loss occurred. Procedural violations—such as an unlawful search or seizure, or a failure to provide Miranda warnings—can lead to suppression of key evidence. Additionally, cooperating with the government or showing acceptance of responsibility can reduce the sentencing range. Together, Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys analyze each case thoroughly to build a well-prepared defense based on the facts and the law.
Penalties and Collateral Consequences of a Wire Fraud Conviction
A conviction for wire fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1343 carries the possibility of substantial federal imprisonment and fines. In addition to incarceration, a defendant may be ordered to pay restitution to victims and forfeit assets connected to the offense. A period of supervised release follows any prison term. Beyond the sentence itself, a federal felony conviction creates lasting collateral consequences: it can affect professional licenses, security clearances, immigration status, and the ability to obtain employment or housing. Because federal sentencing is driven by the advisory guidelines, the amount of loss, the number of victims, and the defendant’s role in the offense significantly influence the outcome. Early engagement with defense counsel—before charges are filed—can materially affect how the investigation proceeds and what sentence exposure the client ultimately faces.
Mr. Sris and the Firm’s Of Counsel Attorneys
Mr. Sris founded Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. in 1997 and has represented individuals in federal criminal matters for more than 25 years. Admitted in Virginia, Maryland, the District of Columbia, New Jersey, and New York, he concentrates his practice on complex federal defense, including wire fraud, mail fraud, bank fraud, and other white‑collar offenses. The firm’s Of Counsel attorneys bring extensive combined legal experience in federal criminal litigation. Together, Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys appear in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland and handle federal investigations, grand jury proceedings, and trials. Results may vary.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between wire fraud and mail fraud?
Wire fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1343 involves using electronic communications to execute a scheme, while mail fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1341 involves using the U.S. Postal Service or private carriers. Both crimes require a scheme to defraud and intent, but the communication channel differs. However, federal prosecutors often charge both when a scheme uses both mail and electronic communications, and the penalties are similar.
Am I automatically guilty if I signed a contract that wasn’t fulfilled?
No. A breach of contract, by itself, is not federal wire fraud. The government must prove that you entered the contract with fraudulent intent at the time and that you used interstate electronic communications in furtherance of that intent. Legitimate business disputes that result in contractual non‑performance are generally civil matters, not criminal federal offenses.
What should I do if I think I am under investigation for wire fraud in Maryland?
Do not speak with investigators, and contact an experienced federal criminal defense attorney immediately. Anything you say can be used against you. Preserve all documents and electronic records, but do not alter or destroy them. An attorney can communicate with the government on your behalf and protect your rights during the investigation.
Can a wire fraud charge be brought for a single email?
Yes, each interstate electronic communication in furtherance of a scheme can be a separate count of wire fraud, even a single email. However, the government must still prove every element: a scheme to defraud, intent, and that the specific communication was used to execute the scheme.
How does the amount of loss affect a wire fraud sentence in federal court?
The amount of loss is one of the most significant factors in calculating the advisory sentencing range under the federal guidelines. A higher loss amount drives a higher offense level, which can increase the recommended prison term by years. Other factors—such as number of victims, sophisticated means, and leadership role—also influence the final range.
What happens if I ignore a federal grand jury subpoena?
Ignoring a grand jury subpoena can result in contempt of court, which carries its own penalties, including fines and jail time. A subpoena requires your appearance or production of documents. An attorney can help you respond appropriately, assert applicable privileges, and protect your interests without violating the subpoena.
Is it possible to avoid an indictment while under investigation?
In some cases, early intervention by defense counsel can persuade the government not to seek an indictment. By presenting exculpatory evidence, challenging the legal theory of the case, or negotiating a non‑prosecution agreement, an attorney may influence the charging decision before an indictment is returned. Each case turns on its own facts.
How much does a federal wire fraud defense lawyer cost?
Fees vary depending on the complexity of the case, the stage at which the attorney is engaged, and the anticipated time commitment. Federal wire fraud cases are document‑intensive and often require substantial investigation, motion practice, and trial preparation. During an initial consultation, the firm can discuss fee structures and answer your questions about the representation.
Maryland Federal Criminal Defense Resources
For additional background on federal wire fraud prosecutions, the following resources may be helpful:
U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland — court information, local rules, and case information.
U.S. Attorney’s Office – District of Maryland — the office that prosecutes federal wire fraud cases in Maryland.
18 U.S.C. § 1343 (Cornell LII) — the full text of the wire fraud statute.
Request a Consultation
To speak with Mr. Sris or the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys about a wire fraud matter, call (888) 437-7747 or use the contact form on our website. Consultations are by appointment. The sooner you involve counsel, the more options you may have.
Rockville Location — 199 E. Montgomery Avenue, Suite 100, Room 211, Rockville, MD 20850
Phone: (888) 437-7747
Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Results may vary.
Last reviewed: July 2026
Reviewed by Mr. Sris, Owner and Founder
Admitted in Virginia, Maryland, the District of Columbia, New Jersey, and New York
Practicing since 1997
Case results depend on a variety of factors unique to each case.